From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 733EF384B0C1; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:36:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 733EF384B0C1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587461787;
 bh=PKHNrPszQICdT3RzH4aMkCBYN+K5G8MQ9DE2tDRU6ts=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=uRBPBUvJyjeEGlI9TrrOG4O5LIYkFGG9tCcBW3Je33d7UpCZGmcu9vNTfRWQVFbo4
 /6JOhVGRfsdqgJgXa/FUxiRK1H4JFBCCeK3n1NkVnIi50XAdj1+5gSdI1w4Y28GVqu
 ffMOg+T9DZjQvG1kKrazgCCOO0GT9NdKoKl7TYeQ=
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/94684] New: OpenACC 'async' clause optimizations
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:36:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
 target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-94684-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:36:27 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94684

            Bug ID: 94684
           Summary: OpenACC 'async' clause optimizations
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: openacc
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

In 'gcc/omp-expand.c:expand_omp_target', we have an optimization that for an
OpenACC 'async' clause, we try to "pack the async arg in to the tag's opera=
nd"
('i_async' handling).

(... which doesn't seem to have any dedicated testsuite coverage.)

That currently only works for 'INTEGER_CST' literals, but not for 'const int
async =3D 1', for example.  Could it, or is 'expand_omp_target' too early f=
or
such things?

Due to only accepting positive values, this doesn't work for the very common
case of 'async' clause without argument, that is: 'async(acc_async_noval)',
that is: 'async(-1)'.

And, couldn't we also optimize the (unusual) case of 'async(acc_async_sync)=
',
that is: 'async(-2)' by removing the 'async' clause altogether?=