From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5DFF8386F028; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:47:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5DFF8386F028
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587480425;
 bh=RQJFA/rXpFo6TlKMXglCVc4OxC5SaDbSje2h5Lo7vlY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=uZZxGB+ZOQxlrnnpfxWYiMiBojZ2m//hjD18ZnP9Tsonj0nKFHDphgIIjvtaD0OE0
 GSWRuyl481ghecViM0FUdvGQhtYvOC9z5RcY1Rh13t4PevwOyhjJBaESGvgRrroHCx
 j1rBiGy8RU97M8zEnvHjWuQ/KOSxnOJLZmZ8KpIg=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/94693] IPA SRA should elide unused out parameters
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:47:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94693-4-t9CnMnhDAo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94693-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94693-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:47:05 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94693

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Another testcase would be like

int foo (void **ret)
{
  *ret =3D NULL;
  return 0;
}

int bar ()
{
  void *dummy;
  return bar (&dummy);
}


int main()
{
  void *dummy;
  if (!foo (&dummy))
    return 0;
  abort ();
}

and ret/dummy can be elided.  I've included the twist that we pass two
different
'dummy' (but I understand IPA SRA works per call and doesn't try "sharing"
the clones?)=