From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 74C08384B0C1; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:13:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 74C08384B0C1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587489190;
 bh=9tldcb877PxuC//EbHhMWNv759GNer71PuZl1GGOZ54=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=RutuUlzjNDcscnQMdbHSDCVb9TE0+Dk9oQBhlaw6uuJFeNJo/9RYPwFgvRcAnGD5+
 eSjz5VVCvbOHyakeX5OuE/iiZe5z05GyratBmTEOgUqcfIO4UzkEGwrHiDGeudMnwW
 d2puBrc0CKgew6JQ2sk8EWPWrIeMezJtmDHFTADg=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/94694] [10 Regression][libgfortran] libgfortran does
 not compile on bare-metal aarch64-none-elf (newlib)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:13:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94694-4-Z72ViDs4Go@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94694-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94694-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:13:10 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94694

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've missed that.  I'm afraid there is no way around missing sinl/cosl/tanl
etc.,
those aren't likely implemented inline by the compiler.  The only exception
would be for targets where long double and double are the same type.
What has libgfortran been doing before?  Seems to me it just wouldn't define
the _gfortran* entrypoint that use them.=