From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id CAAEF39484A4; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:56:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CAAEF39484A4
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587574566;
 bh=VZDYPcFs2rB9PYIRK+veC3dTAMYzWFnF+uP4xf7TXBg=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=wVPv6qwUsJDQ1eQj/7lxISS4mGAXvLOmBZHh2nQiL26QIg8I7qjLrlBtMOR62R2tx
 yAHNPMe16paP+vr97lwKGVO1ctrLgToxH6ar22jsb7enV9PMEDIkChZeddy2cYe5Zx
 /Krhpr/gGwvihbpKVvxg2VCo1Tqq+XQhaZlevcqQ=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94707] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed
 incorrectly with -std=c++17 on powerpc64le
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:56:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94707-4-Q0o22Lz4Zo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94707-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94707-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:56:06 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94707

--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #8)
> If C++17 has added new hidden fields

It hasn't. What changed is how G++ represents such types. The code is the s=
ame
in C++14 and C++17, i.e. there's an empty base class present in the source
code, not something introduced by the language. And there's no such thing a=
s a
"hidden field" in any version of the C++ standard. C++17 didn't introduce
anything here.=