From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 00E77385BF81; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:44:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 00E77385BF81 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588085045; bh=Lbkc4DPBuxfwyT43eXZhNtziAUlkyU23TrSjv/5nIms=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ca/wlnsQPhoMNU+db6y6Z6jYh9vMtb5MdOR27thkmRFlotG/HjBbRFAgiuKpQEduT 3jDNCrrGk27WJRumEde5pybUD7WNQEeYOS6QeOpuGkLZd3U5t4Sjb9NrrpZKRapH8A WlkWhsNs/pMY3ENGfwbNDLJWdWG6ylZCCjt22l7I= From: "matmal01 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94711] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on arm Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:44:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker X-Bugzilla-Who: matmal01 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:44:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94711 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Malcomson --- This has been fixed by. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544625.html In the email linked above I mentioned another problem using `-mabi=3Dapcs-g= nu`. Since that ABI is obsolete (Kyrylo pointed that out to me) I don't think th= at problem should hold up GCC10.=