public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/94724] [10 Regression] wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 07:37:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-94724-4-XMwgJSHs27@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-94724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94724

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a139bc2b492de8a761890a5d299951dede3d8f7b

commit r11-196-ga139bc2b492de8a761890a5d299951dede3d8f7b
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri May 8 09:37:09 2020 +0200

    tree: Avoid variable sharing in get_narrower [PR94724]

    On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
    > >>+      for (tree op = win; TREE_CODE (op) == COMPOUND_EXPR;
    >
    > ..., and new 'op' variable here.
    >
    > >>+        op = TREE_OPERAND (op, 1))
    > >>+     v.safe_push (op);
    > >>+      FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT_REVERSE (v, i, op)
    > >>+     ret = build2_loc (EXPR_LOCATION (op), COMPOUND_EXPR,
    > >>+                       TREE_TYPE (win), TREE_OPERAND (op, 0),
    > >>+                       ret);
    > >>+      return ret;
    > >>     }
    > >>   while (TREE_CODE (op) == NOP_EXPR)
    > >>     {

    There is no reason for the shadowing and op at this point acts as a
    temporary and will be overwritten in FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT_REVERSE anyway.
    So, we can just s/tree // here.

    2020-05-08  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR middle-end/94724
            * tree.c (get_narrower): Reuse the op temporary instead of
            shadowing it.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23  0:22 [Bug tree-optimization/94724] New: wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu qrzhang at gatech dot edu
2020-04-23  5:21 ` [Bug tree-optimization/94724] [10 Regression] wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-23  8:45 ` [Bug middle-end/94724] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-23  9:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-23 19:12 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-23 19:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-08  7:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-05-08  7:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-94724-4-XMwgJSHs27@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).