From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 875FD386F430; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:49:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 875FD386F430 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588924141; bh=I9KvZJ9w8X4bAf4JbLzFyU/mQFdmTW/9E63N8lNTGXo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jrhW25raTLJhVfaNNCn24YeKqGumO/8glfOFbwNPbHAA3jDTnFPOG1BNkauQaeQes qJN6ncqnkwSnie9YdOZCoHWEd4AIuBm54tqNDNSKcuf30jWjpNNIx9AKmSLZAsCA50 rdf0LF2UIFs0KYAvAqV3qcazvBvK/MnAsL3zuxbo= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/94724] [10 Regression] wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-7344-gca6c722561ce9b9d Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 07:49:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 07:49:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94724 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a296f322dea92747a0874cb1fd073313749673e commit r10-8123-g3a296f322dea92747a0874cb1fd073313749673e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Fri May 8 09:37:09 2020 +0200 tree: Avoid variable sharing in get_narrower [PR94724] On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >>+ for (tree op =3D win; TREE_CODE (op) =3D=3D COMPOUND_EXPR; > > ..., and new 'op' variable here. > > >>+ op =3D TREE_OPERAND (op, 1)) > >>+ v.safe_push (op); > >>+ FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT_REVERSE (v, i, op) > >>+ ret =3D build2_loc (EXPR_LOCATION (op), COMPOUND_EXPR, > >>+ TREE_TYPE (win), TREE_OPERAND (op, 0), > >>+ ret); > >>+ return ret; > >> } > >> while (TREE_CODE (op) =3D=3D NOP_EXPR) > >> { There is no reason for the shadowing and op at this point acts as a temporary and will be overwritten in FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT_REVERSE anyway. So, we can just s/tree // here. 2020-05-08 Jakub Jelinek PR middle-end/94724 * tree.c (get_narrower): Reuse the op temporary instead of shadowing it.=