From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 21D21385DC32; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:34:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 21D21385DC32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587627266; bh=T9goqiFDFQvv1FNd8TMR4tWzBOkRPBd0EGWGIDTGLcw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cyxtmWFYa4NFR8CiNVqxGDOtAugPSryS1guvGJlMz3orFA5aesdC6Rxxww2mDdzI3 LJujicMzlOSTf2AUc3LfrZ9uqFuj+a0WgrVza1bciJIXVpvkzpRumT1L8z82pUN0jJ Nyj0+iAfnp+oMnqs13cEpesiuwD/sO9trDPSvoKM= From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94727] [10 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 since r10-5071-g02d895504cc59be0 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:34:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 07:34:26 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94727 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot= gnu.org --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, I'll take a look.=