From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 38DC13894E51; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:14:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 38DC13894E51 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587752087; bh=fPbi9tts+jgyHjHkhUHnO/LJME8bqOTLV/CUfm4RumA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kVvt7mMCAT/hN183KBuWbQoZSY+bY5yAzse4lHsYfdbwWPGL/wJ8GHbL3x3XkA0yi Kw4wFRv/dO/dwb8YSP6LvOA4WHcUoFmWwjYggI4ZnesTI9AdHjZjEGA+Hugsax2Mu5 i/xPTfYtroPSwsoIBG483QG7DG6emSmHr01G74ts= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/94747] Undefined behavior: integer overflow in libsupc++/dyncast.cc Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:14:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:14:47 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94747 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to AK from comment #0) > Integer overflow reported by asan with the following stack trace. asan?! Are you sure? As Jakub says, this is probably the dumb "unsigned-integer-overflow" saniti= zer, which is dumb because unsigned integers can't overflow by definition (they wrap) and because that wrapping is never undefined. The code is fine.=