From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 97194389365F; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:44:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 97194389365F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587768268; bh=FxG44YQ9PHmFx6KzEr6A5w5gz7lzknWVIVFGHDWagps=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vTYK8vnCBWeV+LE7uNDywN4cJt4ekbfSsUTg6XtiCt4m2ficMwNOSWGguqGipLMe5 ClIksq6JnCzP1c8S1ozCZ7k9KrkXgO0zbPxldgEXosMxskevwERUHberoj6dLuX+KL k/U4dru07gB6+d7dRLY9fzzTowEnDTKN+xgAjXMM= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94751] [9/10 Regression] ICE on invalid code in maybe_instantiate_noexcept Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:44:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:44:28 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94751 Marek Polacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot= gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- We now error_mark_node around for a longer time, so we need to handle it.=20 Taking.=