From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 98A4A3858D35; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 19:11:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 98A4A3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1674069096;
	bh=zUsgNrJo0jNEgQaf1j7rTTVcqPUCAuOywyFWSDjsriA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ro60ReB0lcpFXswXJg4aHn01XQWxE6xrkkqa9sMx3UnPabYC0290n9HRxZ9ZY/wa9
	 BhiE2BpF1l3jLTlotGkaUirce2wDZiNZvPfq67cor1YTLtKRfPyypA8PkObZJzG/yw
	 gMw/Vf587jCQxSSRsf7Jn0bprRnRLCMUdJOgBmcs=
From: "i.nixman at autistici dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libquadmath/94756] strtoflt128 assigns some subnormals
 incorrectly on MS Windows
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 19:11:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libquadmath
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: i.nixman at autistici dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94756-4-HsfgXht4TQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94756-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94756-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94756

--- Comment #10 from niXman <i.nixman at autistici dot org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> As Joseph wrote, there were lots of strtod_l.c fixes since 2011 and most =
of
> them weren't incorporated into libquadmath (unlike most of the math/
> functions which were updated a couple of times).
> Wonder if this one isn't
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26137 which also talks =
about
> different behavior on 32-bit arches.

got it, will look at glibc's implementation.=