From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3C6FD384B0C0; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:26:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3C6FD384B0C0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587936409; bh=JmgcocFj6MAQCSKCHVQATvoyjYy1TjekEM3GBWFfLJs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DcEM/IPoVqiTahf9dqJvnvnCkmbahtI7dPYT/9MDIcdtqjBzlBZA6oQJJhdMpIrYT ygdrPRzw/tJ28GxfIWWSqil4uqk+5LtCDIs7mOInj3n2LxkYcz3c3zAVe7oLvkN16b csJErwEEAGNiOsfAhN2Maw1sIvTblnkI2svjGGy8= From: "sbence92 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94770] class with empty base passed incorrectly with -std=c++17 on mingw Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:26:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sbence92 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:26:49 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94770 --- Comment #4 from Bence Szab=C3=B3 --- As a remark for 'same code with -std=3Dc++14 and -std=3Dc++17 here', I can = confirm, the example you provided also produces same assembly for me in c++14 and c+= +17. Also compiling t032 with only c++14 or only c++17 still results in a failing test case (30.71) and then a crash. Maybe this is not the same abi problem?=