From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CCBF2389367A; Mon, 11 May 2020 18:50:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CCBF2389367A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589223038; bh=maLFLbdvd4KxTDWetm9stIfu6cr6TPQSwQe6B17IpfU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lEPdyskli6NkdZWnG2GUQmGoQyMcpVR8eXRBdYqf3/vkHVSXYbu4Dw8/UAvcsPiR8 dK4mHRSHostZ1WujEDU1BZAasnDmVLAmhqQFQTGPxY+ONvicbY1miBsdgYzZFWL499 2NsSvTBk3X1qQ6f2D2qdfNkOk1hmHKBEjvXnQyH4= From: "zhroma at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94775] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1734 since r8-4668-g8a5ee94a082b3d48 Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:50:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zhroma at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:50:38 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94775 --- Comment #15 from Roman Zhuykov --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #14) > Patch reverted from 10/11. Maybe I've missed something in gcc-patches, but why it was reverted? I can imagine reasons to revert in 10 branch, but in master...=