From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 56C3C385DC1F; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:13:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 56C3C385DC1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588065203; bh=dBHUov9OMhr1+Cg9KO0rbPZ4WaDR3tHZjFcCObTFmR0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aIuO9FeYxU+NfJMOE4cjq6OpMQPgLosHkgsnYq3EMK70CQgNgxPLtp5XUaKc2anhA PzXRRqKcTlQnV3a5jaxLZsw3jJtFpgscV8XvmaogfDBZmwJF2gZyvMeCj+aE2xla1x OaA48+oEeVejkY+oG72iTSbsv7IQwtXZCUWSRFF4= From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:13:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:13:23 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94788 --- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to J=C3=BCrgen Reuter from comment #25) > Ok, Simon and I try our best, working independently, me reducing the > existing case further, and he tries to write a small reproducer from scra= tch. Thanks a lot! That is really appreciated.=