From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 523C23858D34; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:36:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 523C23858D34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588008988;
 bh=5Wz23NGQ8S8aK0OBkn/kX1nf3HdAvAGI9ViBskukTpA=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=XCKVu6eEGqBH1VaRyNsWxx1uHLeUjEuFWHq0PdvwpzBqt4FzdE1CXQsE7c9FKDQ25
 E12vA/+C4HUR2mb8wH5F3xvv3e8KtqYTljmkp6B0w9LVqpRq3oTWycyDMl0Fn+Q11o
 xRx9HsdFFIkT3d1tRKsDCQKBjvf2ngKiquMpMgqo=
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [10 Regression] Severe regression leading to
 double free in tcache
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:36:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94788-4-BFNFoBWcwX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:36:28 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94788

--- Comment #9 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8)
> I'd like to understand what went wrong here... I suspect that
> the fix exposed another bug somewhere :-(
>=20
> Is it possible to isolate a test case like that?  If that is
> the offending patch, I think it is probably about a pointer to a
> variable of a derived type, either via a function or as
> an argument (look at the test case to see what the patch
> fixes).

I'm on the way to condense the reproducer. At latest tomorrow you will get =
it.
I really hope we get this fixed before the gcc 10 release.=