From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 378863897805; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 22:23:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 378863897805 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588026204; bh=sJcnrEAYEBqSRBRlPiCDQrW4Ck4MrpR/pKF1Yb2Dobc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=t1N73dJ0OibRlbHjrMG/XLvJw7O5cK41MDAP19cnlxw7Yh2ihXlgoycglxqIKok3S edmbi4gjjEg5kU54FCV4Qg/dKWuHlcIe6AAB7F1GZx8hZfxbParvhZR6cC3sQbtrfl r0lST1XUcMlSClMbX69TgcfEwkfA6Ys5R4qqo4Uw= From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 22:23:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 22:23:24 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94788 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to J=C3=BCrgen Reuter from comment #20) > Thanks a lot for reverting, Thomas, shall I further reduce the reproducer, > or can you work with it now? In comment #2 you mention a finalizer. There are 22 open bug reports about finalization. It is likely that Thomas's patch uncovered yet another finalization bug.=