From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 03BF73851C04; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:12:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 03BF73851C04
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588061554;
 bh=TxO6dLfRfJqKxEyCszMFu0rR7RganbdhQeaYrdAYpM4=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=oAf1/xtpIGodL442tT8nBCQ85iOovklRTCuaCkb0H/T+6czYBkf9Q704eb3hes+5r
 STnF5j8OSqTtApzVuqEGta59QcjCMuspgWs6dEcO32N30wsKYorRM3Rtgm33QZJBjv
 WE+hjh8Lx+TYSKoxb7oT7DF8iBWSyoVrCAo7dld0=
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to
 double free in tcache
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:12:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94788-4-Dh1bdhMtbO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 08:12:34 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94788

--- Comment #25 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #23)
> (In reply to J=C3=BCrgen Reuter from comment #20)
> > Thanks a lot for reverting, Thomas, shall I further reduce the reproduc=
er,
> > or can you work with it now?
>=20
> I could use it to confirm that there is a bug, but the test case is
> far too complex for analysis, and it is also not possible to put
> it in the testsuite.  So, at the moment, work on PR 93956 (a F95 wrong-co=
de
> bug, hence a high priority) is effectively blocked.
>=20
> So yes, I would appreciate a shorter reproducer, especially since
> I plan to revisit the whole span and pointer area once gcc 10
> is out of the door.
>=20
> So, I'll mark this bug as WAITING for now.

Ok, Simon and I try our best, working independently, me reducing the existi=
ng
case further, and he tries to write a small reproducer from scratch.=