public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 05:57:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-94788-4-KA2BgXnPyz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-94788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788

Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING
             Blocks|                            |93956

--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #20)
> Thanks a lot for reverting, Thomas, shall I further reduce the reproducer,
> or can you work with it now?

I could use it to confirm that there is a bug, but the test case is
far too complex for analysis, and it is also not possible to put
it in the testsuite.  So, at the moment, work on PR 93956 (a F95 wrong-code
bug, hence a high priority) is effectively blocked.

So yes, I would appreciate a shorter reproducer, especially since
I plan to revisit the whole span and pointer area once gcc 10
is out of the door.

So, I'll mark this bug as WAITING for now.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93956
[Bug 93956] Wrong array creation with p => array_dt(1:n)%component

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-28  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-27  8:38 [Bug fortran/94788] New: " juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27  8:38 ` [Bug fortran/94788] " juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27  9:46 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 10:27 ` [Bug fortran/94788] [10 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-27 10:41 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 12:19 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 12:49 ` simon.brass at desy dot de
2020-04-27 17:09 ` simon.brass at desy dot de
2020-04-27 17:26 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-27 17:36 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 18:30 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-27 19:26 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 19:33 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 20:39 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 20:40 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 20:40 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 21:15 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 21:38 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-27 21:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-27 21:55 ` [Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-27 22:02 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-27 22:23 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-27 22:33 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-28  5:57 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-04-28  8:02 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-28  8:12 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-28  8:17 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-28  9:13 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-28 11:17 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-28 11:36 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-28 14:06 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-29  0:38 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-29  9:09 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-29 18:32 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-29 21:58 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-30 16:31 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-30 16:35 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-30 16:49 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-30 17:37 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-04-30 17:38 ` juergen.reuter at desy dot de
2020-05-01 12:27 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-01 12:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-01 12:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-02 15:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-02 19:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-21 10:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-94788-4-KA2BgXnPyz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).