From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6126A396E050; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:35:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6126A396E050 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588264509; bh=19Fv0Z2ZZsXgt6EGIeQTpMG0r9CDVytPltNc1bL45Ac=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gD1VNUsdwWeCrdU7UQPc2Bi1yTbUsqs1tqSgCem2lNE//ht/DmEZME1MClv2Mu1cd /grHmpZB1ER1QgBERA0XfmWQrKXyeFk2Zzt0CRFxbMoBduNY+6cI55WLPJ5gXFR4F0 rn4qMEWDbg5s1WWrB8yCo7APIoOgpsjvK0ArJ0JY= From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [8/9 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:35:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:35:09 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94788 --- Comment #36 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter --- Hm, I hope I didn't change the flavor of the bug, but you can cross-check w= ith the very first reproducer which contains our code more or less unchanged (except for the build setup with autotools etc.).=