From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4A0EB3858D34; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:26:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A0EB3858D34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588008381;
 bh=ZXt36C0+zgCh6qvpYJpNnEOlrN6Me/yIH+pHeyBUppY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=j4v91OUC+m7FjxbwAfMGitcP13uLpDVJ3SNdcJ+ZcGTgqHXvXzcXhxCt+5ZPR7bQy
 3UinGVEPpyYiTPYMgP7k460u8/mMTurThFF7o/9AR3caMXJnThK+jnK/V6JZq1OfVL
 91oJKmJEiWFJI+IcyB78ZmRmSpJXmzR0id70kc6s=
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [10 Regression] Severe regression leading to
 double free in tcache
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:26:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94788-4-eExujH6LQJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94788-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:26:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94788

--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'd like to understand what went wrong here... I suspect that
the fix exposed another bug somewhere :-(

Is it possible to isolate a test case like that?  If that is
the offending patch, I think it is probably about a pointer to a
variable of a derived type, either via a function or as
an argument (look at the test case to see what the patch
fixes).=