From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D9598386F836; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:30:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D9598386F836 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588012243; bh=KZC5z4vUc5YklgO1HO0cmfyhcZO8Fcou+H7sbqDoRaI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=H/KuaB98l5Qla1S3ZsRnGzSvn37eFrftUgfykvI4z7DiUkBUtIhp1odA5OTcWX1yb I2pfVeXOs+WBq5pwhvi1oSPEHYy7ZGAUeYTmHj4TTYFHPY2i1fFLbEu4tiyqZfp+wS ceo76+4BGhv9t8zQNV6iHaXVv8V2O1dAE/90ad3g= From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/94788] [10 Regression] Severe regression leading to double free in tcache Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:30:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:30:44 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94788 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Can you maybe bisect this to a specific (fortran) commit in GCC? Richard, when is the last time (presumably) that either a fix can go in or the patch can be reverted?=