From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0C531386F43C; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:36:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0C531386F43C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588113361;
 bh=YYpaAqcS/2Mb7gsf19xfTyjwWMAFyLako56k4J0Z4Rw=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Yq1cNPJxIYQElS5bBLHA94LOIY98yaL4PnOCAjnevPRs2IV5tP+eIhrfLt8bjsqpP
 7G9F7MZkTmYjFNpIHDEe/Olo9584NX5PlQc9t2g6YwBzhB+n3+ShyraJinQP2nVN55
 S7xZYUvVfUdKQ6hQO6WXejogF1ukoFuT8hMibMrE=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/94823] modulo arithmetic bug in random.tcc
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:36:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-94823-4-8t9cblPHDe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94823-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94823-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:36:01 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94823

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note there are two loops here where we could have an issue but ....

In the first loop, it is ok usage because __k will be only 0 when the array
will be filled with the same data (0x8b8b8b8bu) so that usage does not matt=
er.

The second loop is where it might matter but __k will never be 0 as __m is =
will
either be greater than or equal to __n.=