From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2BD833955611; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:53:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2BD833955611 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588110835; bh=arrERQ0kxX6qCnol9qGPX0oIcVVOJXFRBIuMkR4wzBw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=thmoj3pgytFWK6g18uwHNOeyzzM2NYyz2FxQpajq6RMlbR2pXowGCDw78hfrx496J 5R3TeGOXrUmyMBliG1J+50///cOlyks3ThJUzMp4w2et2FzS5CTIPYno3JWP1CR0ji w0wq4P0L9cewJGGUNKnjuERDP+rTQ2gLIf6XNoN8= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94826] [10 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr94780.c after r10-7999 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:53:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component bug_status keywords cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:53:55 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94826 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|other |target Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed| |2020-04-28 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Similar fix to the powerpc back-end to what was done to the x86 backend nee= ds to happen.=