From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 39AA3385AC19; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:18:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 39AA3385AC19 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588144732; bh=Zwpm4NNPiMv8m5/kPXvNdUf2tTE7jpWvs/mxEYw5RSw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cFXuKEJrYkYNFBrHiuUlUW91He/yyVLkfUdsflk6zbtX+MgeVx30JTQhGHdUxyCuq npENaspCdrXMxdVFlc54XQ2Vu1n/EsDqHIkGN3SRqCBgx+KhtiHmzXdXv4fIf+p8/m 8oQJHKJ1oahU4LfAPE2JGaQ5uVVy7zY/cgvFfm+A= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/94842] [8/9/10 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_label_expr, at gimplify.c:2573 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:18:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc target_milestone cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 07:18:52 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94842 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Last reconfirmed| |2020-04-29 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. Not sure if the testcase is valid (side-effect in a nested func= tion definition?).=