From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D45EB385DC0A; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:19:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D45EB385DC0A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588162748; bh=tiqV+1LzYzWEA7UXxxWJsdUhZNhuHfRNfbgaa3XyzNw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=V89PffoncbJyPclKcCNkuk2gbJIV55k48i3qIq4IIHUEQdbFBPnR4RKyUduDKz4yE HJDtKUo3i7MiPOJVT2PO/6H5yXxk8MZoJuLTJCaDV2UOP1ydP79AJL0OqfSnPT16jK WDulF9dutFNuKsQgKOVFes6KpaAXH0RhTeQDz90s= From: "robert at ocallahan dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94845] DWARF function name doesn't match demangled name in base type template parameters Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:19:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: robert at ocallahan dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:19:08 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94845 --- Comment #5 from robert at ocallahan dot org --- We do our best to consume what g++ produces, but in the situation of commen= t #1 that is difficult. Whether or not it's "correct DWARF" is really irrelevant; not matching the demangler causes real problems. Thanks for the link to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D81932= . That is very similar to the problem I'm facing. No strategy was decided on there, but it seems to me that matching the demanged name would be a clear step in= the right direction. I can't see how it could *hurt*.=