From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E0F613894E7C; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:57:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E0F613894E7C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588229839;
 bh=eZaic2su0bu2UOtrHuLuiH5GODL4o9pZbgkPHBkWpbo=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=XcktetAk40OhQWtYdN/9X2v6fw2W8Ag3OgKZdAFNK4Y05mGpTpiOCYoQRbDOvUv48
 qpIhfNqJZyTy6LJ0zmganMxXPPbWFp9VKfLlAR0uCj/DN6I2u6zvLlzanp7kaR4wsp
 wyj/owlnfauGsgx6KTFDJgyZ/Au2VAdbuFoU4kWE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94863] Failure to use blendps over mov when possible
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:57:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94863-4-RYqxf3bEoG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94863-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94863-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:57:20 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94863

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
throughputs put aside - how's port allocation and latency figures?  That sa=
id,
GCC usually sides on the smaller insn encoding variant when latency isn't
different - we're usually not looking at throughput since throughput figures
are quite useless if you look at single insns (and our decision is per
individual instruction).  Somehow modeling alternatives during scheduling
might make more sense but that's not implemented.=