From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E0F16385703C; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:18:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E0F16385703C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1595618311; bh=bzuK/CLi6raLYHIWrU7/ZX6qyfcKxNaOGwfb/Fk93jk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PRpZDIfV7EuoHP+eYHa8XxCtXH9tmLLmjrPZKW+K1sOZWGDUsBTXT+8qyd76pC6un ujuOgeBcty0kYm8mv9kbGRJgB5CQFnVANXcCIhzGoNsZuXhsEzj7QW6xa+/FTUMliY UIXRdbF9oXDYPd8v79X5prs6EjZIrsOB3vG6/Jjs= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94867] [9 Regression] New (since gcc 8) false positive with -Wnull-dereference in very simple code Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:18:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:18:32 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94867 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- I see this warning with GCC 10.2 and with trunk when using the flags -O -std=3Dc++14 -Wnull-dereference as well. Should this be marked as a 9/10/11 regression then?=