From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 853F7389365C; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:32:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 853F7389365C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588275170;
 bh=TJ3jbr2i8sAkDl9XJqIH3n4rxyV24gNGljJX2nkvFso=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=oPJwgyxxRlWC8UjMByjpjZU7RgYV9HtMw2mePCAzrfnUkj4wWVD8QcbWD6skHBnVd
 YsiZBD66V0m9WnINUU9Lt1ILOg/blvRHIPTZ2Y5YYf9zv2vF0r5MtF+r5sQn6KT45k
 r8SpsFq3KQs01zc98QpKFOei1AuiRVkC/elWbbow=
From: "gabravier at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94892] (x >> 31) + 1 not getting narrowed to compare
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:32:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gabravier at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94892-4-2LjDsRGY01@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:32:50 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94892

--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> ---
In that case, then, GCC is generating sub-optimal code for `(x >> 31) + 1`
alone since it optimises that to the same thing as LLVM=