From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 74C3A3858C31; Sun, 28 May 2023 23:15:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 74C3A3858C31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1685315744; bh=0qYNSyr5hONuwwCKTRj+r/5Ja8U2EqtCgqsPJCV9jNM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B6so6hJZvgnUowUNVq4/+VAqZQIXYMfWimjSacH291FPwfBiMqKDKGbYBleK6XZDW o59VMrp6C7tAwYwwKK6C4bd0xO90esFthiH+AjOe5oJ7CkkL4OZNU7sekD2jzMvvGB peEMRxZxTKoBQBdHZ7hByIfo7ql0SJnHVpdULYhU= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94892] (x >> 31) + 1 not getting narrowed to compare Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 23:15:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94892 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Two things we should simplify: > _4 =3D _3 >> 31; > _4 !=3D -1 >=20 > Into: > _3 >=3D 0 (if _3 is signed, otherwise false) >=20 > (this will solve f0) See bug 85234 comment #5 on handle that one (g and g2).=