From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1389F389851F; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:25:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1389F389851F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588267504;
 bh=nCZkNXJPBPbKqSPrc72bkVmugUyEy7DBtxRC3OMSdLU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=aJtUyjs5O82GHQ+/0NfUIX9NBO/AH1Y8j51Z2w7983i/qW1Rv1nOfiy3io1iP3DDe
 JIYARyHJXv3Pdg7lT3PfShWYnO9o2nb2xAIrSpIbbo13Cz2hqKt6NdNwhRyD+5OVey
 FWHIiHi2PVrCgKRz8xAd1VMnaJWXcA6XMgZMOrpc=
From: "gabravier at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94892] New: (x >> 31) + 1 not getting
 narrowed to compare
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:25:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gabravier at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-94892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:25:04 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94892

            Bug ID: 94892
           Summary: (x >> 31) + 1 not getting narrowed to compare
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: gabravier at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

inline int sign(int x)
{
    return (x >> 31) | ((unsigned)-x >> 31);
}

bool f(int x)
{
    return sign(x) > -1;
}

With -O3, LLVM produces this :

f(int):
  test edi, edi
  setns al
  ret

GCC produces this :

f(int):
  sar edi, 31
  lea eax, [rdi+1]
  ret

Changing `f` to `(x >> 31) + 1` results in it being optimized optimally=