From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4F2C63870905; Mon,  4 May 2020 08:04:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4F2C63870905
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588579473;
 bh=3Uth0/AhqXfQgx/LO77930JvFZaMel0w3GU/TVsUBZ8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=NfAFh8Vj5eQ2mJxiHM8YneGhQjKQYHdfKkvQAUghVBzCiFV3rE3J6VfYm2JvnzN94
 0VK3NQ++S5jkSsa1R2qGsqoUwCsF6sp9yfG2xAobAkIDpLYUlYaZeolTUTgxxbc+r+
 1h6zvfP9sAB6GcpOtKw02l/693/oh1SQYzo8PrGo=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/94902] internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid use
 of register 'frame'
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 08:04:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-94902-4-4y9zuR0axn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 08:04:33 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94902

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is diagnosed in ira.c (ira_setup_eliminable_regset), but nothing is
actually changed in the IL.  I wonder if the RA shouldn't for the eliminable
registers that can't be eliminated couldn't delete the instructions or
something similar, so that we don't ICE during error-recovery later on.=