public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94907] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in check_return_expr) since r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 13:28:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-94907-4-ZdEXw2ULwz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-94907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94907

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d4c7e05de438fb0672f376e628c18812eea8982

commit r10-8114-g3d4c7e05de438fb0672f376e628c18812eea8982
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed May 6 23:36:31 2020 +0200

    c++: Don't synthesize sfk_comparison method multiple times [PR94907]

    On the following testcase we ICE, because synthesize_method is called twice
    on the same sfk_comparison method fndecl, the first time it works fine
    because start_preparsed_function in that case sets both
    current_function_decl and cfun, but second time it is called it only sets
    the former and keeps cfun NULL, so we ICE when trying to store
    current_function_returns_value.
    I think it is just wrong to call synthesize_method multiple times, and most
    synthesize_method callers avoid that by not calling it if DECL_INITIAL is
    already set, so this patch does that too.

    2020-05-06  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c++/94907
            * method.c (defaulted_late_check): Don't call synthesize_method
            on constexpr sfk_comparison if it has been called on it already.

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth8.C: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-07 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01 18:08 [Bug c++/94907] New: ICE: Segmentation fault (in check_return_expr) asolokha at gmx dot com
2020-05-01 18:30 ` [Bug c++/94907] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-04  5:42 ` [Bug c++/94907] ICE: Segmentation fault (in check_return_expr) since r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-04  6:27 ` [Bug c++/94907] [10/11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-04 13:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-06 21:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-07 11:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-07 13:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-05-07 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-94907-4-ZdEXw2ULwz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).