From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8E017386F800; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:11:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E017386F800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589965870; bh=5Zbn29T5TmTgM/hOsvPGc+5Sdga6S2Oqqla3laU9mEg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=W3z8vBsp77ujTptiswJQcNpGo/aaxQIpgEwwYUEKuWVusJ5bfftUm5i9sSi9mt4st LaDqTl4whj42xdci1WPzu/knSjURdt7oidZj25mg9diEuKp9Cem2z7bsQWYT681SqA 7rc7CEtGDUE1/zdnB+jLQ7QWzZixNY3yRaH0xy6I= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:11:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 09:11:10 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94910 --- Comment #9 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- (In reply to Rafael Avila de Espindola from comment #8) > I can confirm that the proposed patch fixes the issue for me. >=20 > Thank you so much! I thank you for the bug report. We had the regression since the very beginn= ing!=