From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 39F273894E40; Mon, 4 May 2020 21:28:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 39F273894E40 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588627736; bh=TTR0keEiUih4u1rWHMJuqEaibG+MRkLBYuB8XvKL+sg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Tf8imYLITGTyzr2o4I6iXGgsFmFXXeTKSSfOYM2e4qr/OaL0nKo9LsJGB/j/1kluT VE8lJMaEV70msAkUoLDHjRcItH2i/qgR76fpWIoenXpHuc+8OwXlS8upCrx1LJ13Gn xelCO7lqgA4zjOO3v0G0EgA7c0HKTezHQpNT58yE= From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/94918] [8/9/10/11 regression] Ada bootstrap errors on Cygwin64 Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 21:28:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc cc everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 21:28:56 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94918 Eric Botcazou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-04 Summary|Ada bootstrap errors on |[8/9/10/11 regression] Ada |Cygwin64 |bootstrap errors on | |Cygwin64 CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.o= rg Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- The g-sercom.adb failure is indeed a small oversight.=