From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3AFEB3856967; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 22:20:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3AFEB3856967
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661466011;
	bh=9+Px1jwJSr1dA0m/2F2Vj2HNcO9n0zZ+Yb0NGIVPZrU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=W+6SK/BOcYEEiQdsYHXQ/iDUKOOwxsfM3e9jesOL7C5g/PV6ucteimjSpYEEWDlk+
	 8BPIchFxkgqkWdJRaB3JHH6aouJt7GrhfK0mcFoi76nvptBZKHeZukECmkoHZ7PLZm
	 ZjxPqkLiDSaafTawkY1HUCTBhNuoztBRM+MP3V0A=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94920] Failure to optimize abs pattern from
 arithmetic with selected operands based on comparisons with 0
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 22:20:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94920-4-2uDvH2fcT0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94920-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94920-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94920

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Paul Hua from comment #5)
> >=20
> > Yes, we should do. This also fails the ABS_EXPR scan-tree-dump on Loong=
Arch.
>=20
> And on riscv32. I will look into that failure later this week.

I am suspecting it is because for both LoongArch and RISCV,
logical-op-non-short-circuit defualts to 0. I am going to debug it right no=
w.=