From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9D111385AC19; Mon, 4 May 2020 08:44:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9D111385AC19 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588581892; bh=CLuqal4RmlJvowBCHLxtzi21CgL8jjxTKXlvE/DBjss=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wmQhsMYZtO7ecpgtvLtMO1UCE1wcwbqrtbVX/gKZIydBlo9J+AcJBJ7K7nVnPEc2t t4IWLsl2VmasAIhl/NeVhzpiaOnhjt24PoDF2uBx97V/sbyjV8IQzCkPVwQi9ZLW7v A8mb8FQnQ5rtFtsBkc7si2D+xsgwryglYRFS3exA= From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94921] Failure to optimize nots with sub into single add Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 08:44:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 08:44:52 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94921 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-04 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > x + y ? Correct. llvm: leal (%rdi,%rsi), %eax retq gcc: notl %edi subl %esi, %edi movl %edi, %eax notl %eax ret Confirmed, looks like a job for a tree combiner.=