public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/94934] New: Failure to inline addv
@ 2020-05-03 11:08 gabravier at gmail dot com
2020-05-04 6:47 ` [Bug target/94934] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: gabravier at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-03 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94934
Bug ID: 94934
Summary: Failure to inline addv
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gabravier at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
int f(int x, int y)
{
return x + y;
}
With -O3 -ftrapv, LLVM outputs this :
f(int, int): # @f(int, int)
mov eax, edi
add eax, esi
jo .LBB0_1
ret
.LBB0_1:
ud2
GCC outputs this :
f(int, int):
sub rsp, 8
call __addvsi3
add rsp, 8
ret
`-ftrapv` may not be specifically intended for speed, but it seems to make
sense to inline it on targets that have direct support for the instructions it
uses.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94934] Failure to inline addv
2020-05-03 11:08 [Bug tree-optimization/94934] New: Failure to inline addv gabravier at gmail dot com
@ 2020-05-04 6:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-06 14:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-04 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94934
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's up to targets to decide but as was said in another bug -ftrapv hasn't seen
much love (and wants re-implementation).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94934] Failure to inline addv
2020-05-03 11:08 [Bug tree-optimization/94934] New: Failure to inline addv gabravier at gmail dot com
2020-05-04 6:47 ` [Bug target/94934] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-06 14:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 8:34 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-06 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94934
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, -ftrapv should just be reimplemented using the ubsan/__builtin_*_overflow
internal functions or perhaps killed altogether, one can use
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94934] Failure to inline addv
2020-05-03 11:08 [Bug tree-optimization/94934] New: Failure to inline addv gabravier at gmail dot com
2020-05-04 6:47 ` [Bug target/94934] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-06 14:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-18 8:34 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
2020-05-18 9:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-03 3:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: gabravier at gmail dot com @ 2020-05-18 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94934
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> ---
In that case, it looks really easy to reimplemnet `-ftrapv` as literally just
enabling `-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error`.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94934] Failure to inline addv
2020-05-03 11:08 [Bug tree-optimization/94934] New: Failure to inline addv gabravier at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 8:34 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
@ 2020-05-18 9:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-03 3:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-18 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94934
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Gabriel Ravier from comment #3)
> In that case, it looks really easy to reimplemnet `-ftrapv` as literally
> just enabling `-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow
> -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error`.
It shouldn't be literally that, because -ftrapv should be able to coexist with
other UBSan sanitizers (just not signed-integer-overflow) and e.g. let the
other UBSan sanitizers have different decision on what to do on error (the
trap. vs. fatal error vs. just diagnostics and continue).
And for -ftrapv we should consider using the library functions rather than
emitting code inline if it would be too large to match past behavior.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94934] Failure to inline addv
2020-05-03 11:08 [Bug tree-optimization/94934] New: Failure to inline addv gabravier at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-05-18 9:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-03 3:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-03 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94934
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 101521.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101521 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-03 3:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-03 11:08 [Bug tree-optimization/94934] New: Failure to inline addv gabravier at gmail dot com
2020-05-04 6:47 ` [Bug target/94934] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-06 14:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-18 8:34 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
2020-05-18 9:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-03 3:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).