From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 771413890039; Tue,  5 May 2020 18:04:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 771413890039
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588701869;
 bh=/igXEuGRzAkeMQZool3ghwxmPEmsYZ/P1RAxYP0GmNA=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=hNq9smiaNwYCu0/Y4CAiMoLSOYXplhS/4pGWidTSfGB0UqnpwDyQTRzQOfCkLyikx
 pbB8B3jGpnq4TRYNXLgycGNF7yO8EzLXOz+iQI6n7N30+qcGnYNOBh7ALVjBKqeZIx
 Meq880fBfou/AeUOjOSfn0Tm7DdyJs25eaPYgKYE=
From: "artu72 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94943] [10 Regression] A module does not export
 allocatable attribute of herein arrays.
Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 18:04:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: artu72 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94943-4-MpSv8BMRkw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94943-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 18:04:29 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94943

--- Comment #2 from Andrea Mastellone <artu72 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> There is very little we can do without a minimum example that shows the
> problem.  What you have attached cannot be compiled by anyone as
> deallocate_vars.f90 contains a dozen or so USE statements and you haven't
> provided those modules.  In addition, we don't do mpif90.  What happens if
> you remove all of the unnecessary compiler options you use and use actual=
ly
> use gfortran.

Ok, i will try to reduce the code to minimal part that can reproduce the
problem without using mpif90. I'll send you something asap.=