From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E9EC0383F858; Thu,  7 May 2020 12:57:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9EC0383F858
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588856262;
 bh=SKkIIH0TTCCI4t34ddshRrHvfmtaf+WuFtL/xuFTvGA=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=snYZevIo8Wt4gz7YljkM3ntTxOyxYFd62jzE1jMBeoe0g/bG8fTFvImwsyfyVWya7
 qeSlWZhE3D4reOcmdpw0lx4qUzXnVf1tb/IPsCOvnxeNtmgvXE2OTYVcBHDZ8Fgsn+
 W5NctHbhD/HLOrgZJZf3t+wVszX41lfdaQMhB6gI=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvOTQ5NDZdIFs5LzEwLzExIFJlZ3Jlc3Npb25dIGVy?=
 =?UTF-8?B?cm9yOiDigJh0ZW1wbGF0ZTxjbGFzcyByZXR1cm5UeXBlPiBKU0M6OkZ1bmN0?=
 =?UTF-8?B?aW9uUHRyOjpGdW5jdGlvblB0cihyZXR1cm5UeXBlICgqKSgpKeKAmSBjYW5u?=
 =?UTF-8?B?b3QgYmUgb3ZlcmxvYWRlZCBzaW5jZSByMTAtNzk5OC1nNWYxY2QxZGExYTgw?=
 =?UTF-8?B?NWMzZA==?=
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 12:57:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94946-4-XRqyg3BY8i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94946-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94946-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 12:57:43 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94946

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d865b29abc99122e9faf109fe8faf2d6616a073

commit r11-164-g1d865b29abc99122e9faf109fe8faf2d6616a073
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu May 7 14:56:51 2020 +0200

    testsuite: Improve g++.dg/ext/attr-parm-1.C testcase [PR94946]

    The testcase in the current form doesn't FAIL without the patch on
    x86_64-linux unless also testing with -m32; as that the 64-bit testing
    on that target is probably way more common, and we can use also attribu=
tes
    that FAIL without the patch with -m64, the following patch adjusts the
    test, so that it FAILs without the patch for both -m64 and -m32 (but not
    -mx32) and PASSes with the patch.

    2020-05-07  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c++/94946
            * g++.dg/ext/attr-parm-1.C: Enable the test also for lp64 x86, =
use
            sysv_abi and ms_abi attributes in that case instead of fastcall=
 and
            no attribute.=