From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E8BA0386EC42; Tue, 5 May 2020 06:59:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E8BA0386EC42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588661951; bh=o5i1gcXzksW/iu6QClDOugW54qzTFtH3JbNfmmdWZ0A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TYN+A30S3xZILp5UbNqoEC5zPpO+Mx4mBBVNUAsOMYuYN/hBLbaIKuCiHdyUH7DbT s70PVZMSzxCDvPwXeXIEx7lAraWhqafdrB5KHBH3kauqYtFEP58QuIxuDbzJQOf5Gl R1QhQYOLTxJMzO9qA+sfn7qUJc/WVROJFRNWFYmE= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/94947] [8/9/10/11 Regression] -fipa-pta + pthread_once crash since r6-5684-g47e5754e17e9ac3b Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 06:59:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status target_milestone assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 06:59:12 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94947 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot = gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. It's a little tricky but I think it boils down to extern void abort (); extern void baz (); extern void (*baz_call)(); static int *p; static void foo () { if (*p !=3D 1) abort (); } int main() { int x =3D 1; p =3D &x; baz_call =3D foo; baz (); return 0; } --- void (*baz_call)(); void baz () { baz_call (); } and the issue being that escaping foo at baz_call =3D foo does not escape foos call uses/clobbers.=