From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6DFAB388F429; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:28:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6DFAB388F429 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588696082; bh=6XjDeDW0mdZmZO9aX8V6LO2tSyjx8h3TD5tsH7zjevo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bYhxBnYluW3ATv949cDdQG2X8zVmoTPtvcKvCofpAS/FY4hl53olgCg8GD6S5b9sM BHVk49iSP2CxRIzo0kaMbDOzIOf9VGoQIWwyzveiq9YiZEDmhk2/6CAlUBVhdDWibi vRyVIJZUBjWc9SJ4OwVvctaw7c5ahW14DXYAmeG4= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94951] [8/9/10/11 Regression] dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules when using super class for a template type Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 16:28:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 16:28:02 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94951 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48456 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D48456&action=3Dedit gcc11-pr94951.patch Untested fix. It seems just wrong to call the c-family strict_aliasing_war= ning for dependent types, we shouldn't query alias sets of dependent types and do any decisions based on what that gives.=