From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BEA5F386F442; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:27:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BEA5F386F442
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1591907230;
 bh=OXHuWOflgdycTCsiIHQZh6C2nEYmmn9u1N2WnYR3PkQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=RnWpbDWUQOKiHIUFNcHs37S6cvfAfm/w8UG6CDhpMxDiGRgMlcXl3kWmnTbMj4BsE
 MQQH+vA33mttR0DZ5aPoEaJi7dvapXDqw5ZUASErdeoU0UdFpiwt9z0xqancby0T8+
 I0zH7G+jQLJyIdLhKgMCtyceUFRE7oS1JmzI1f9k=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94955] [10 Regression] ICE in to_wide
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:27:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94955-4-ZT73esnjLl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94955-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:27:10 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94955

--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
<mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18436d87ff85282b200579cb8da496659632ad6b

commit r10-8277-g18436d87ff85282b200579cb8da496659632ad6b
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 11 16:26:41 2020 -0400

    c++: ICE when shortening right shift [PR94955]

    Since r10-6527 fold_for_warn calls maybe_constant_value, which means it
    can fold more than it previously could.  In this testcase it means that
    cp_build_binary_op/RSHIFT_EXPR set short_shift because now we were able
    to fold op1 to an INTEGER_CST.  But then when actually performing the
    shortening we crashed because cp_fold_rvalue wasn't able to fold as much
    as f_f_w and so tree_int_cst_sgn crashed on a NOP_EXPR.  Therefore the
    calls should probably match.

            PR c++/94955
            * typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Use fold_for_warn instead of
            cp_fold_rvalue.

            * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-shift2.C: New test.=