From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F1FF6389001F; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:21:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F1FF6389001F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1588702895; bh=i0qULVZHTBr9wN+Bnk8fRHoLn9AHGgG5R0QY5fSTux8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dciw07DAdC/8ZzlQ8r6WUqPBaJ9AwimwQDnpjVfMwU9tXKGUDx1V32e2TlsNHp5tb dvyiZw+hOEAbcRpEvEFzGH0i3H/Hf3XrxQJSh9aP8tEVW67/tD9TD5ISa83CPzR3h9 h0CE1s5MDnhCAdMpUpuDo0ukg3TidDzVNGngqPFY= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94956] Unable to remove impossible ffs() test for zero Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 18:21:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 18:21:36 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94956 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Another option would be to fold FFS (x) for x known non-zero into CTZ (x) += 1 in match.pd.=