public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "d at ilvokhin dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94972] New: Function multi-versioning binary may crash dynamic linker Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 13:37:49 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-94972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94972 Bug ID: 94972 Summary: Function multi-versioning binary may crash dynamic linker Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: d at ilvokhin dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 48468 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48468&action=edit Simplified version of function multi-versioning example I compiled simple binary (a simplified version of function multi-versioning example from gcc.gnu.org) and do ldd -u -r on result. This leads to ldd segfault in __cpu_indicator_init from libgcc_s.so. Behaviour is observed at least for GCC 9.1.1 and 7.3.1 (both from Red Hat devtoolset). $ g++ --version g++ (GCC) 9.1.1 20190605 (Red Hat 9.1.1-2) Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ g++ tt.cpp -o cpp $ ldd -u -r ./cpp /usr/bin/ldd: line 116: 6148 Segmentation fault (core dumped) LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_WARN=yes LD_BIND_NOW=yes LD_LIBRARY_VERSION=$verify_out LD_VERBOSE= LD_DEBUG="unused" "$@ Backtrace is looks like that: (gdb) bt #0 0x00007efccf094c87 in __cpu_indicator_init () from /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 #1 0x0000000000401178 in ?? () #2 0x00007fff5f97e220 in ?? () #3 0x00007efccf8bce5f in _dl_relocate_object () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (gdb) disass Dump of assembler code for function __cpu_indicator_init: 0x00007efccf094c70 <+0>: push %r15 0x00007efccf094c72 <+2>: push %r14 0x00007efccf094c74 <+4>: push %r13 0x00007efccf094c76 <+6>: push %r12 0x00007efccf094c78 <+8>: push %rbp 0x00007efccf094c79 <+9>: xor %ebp,%ebp 0x00007efccf094c7b <+11>: push %rbx 0x00007efccf094c7c <+12>: sub $0x18,%rsp 0x00007efccf094c80 <+16>: mov 0x212351(%rip),%rax # 0x7efccf2a6fd8 => 0x00007efccf094c87 <+23>: mov (%rax),%eax 0x00007efccf094c89 <+25>: test %eax,%eax
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-06 13:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-06 13:37 d at ilvokhin dot com [this message] 2020-05-06 14:42 ` [Bug target/94972] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-21 0:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-94972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).