From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id F0CF83870847; Thu,  7 May 2020 10:46:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F0CF83870847
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588848396;
 bh=xRD44xjEOhX6k/NZqKaEb7fte06h6BP2OQnxu+OU0uQ=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=sgVCVF4LLLYflgxaFtFaUdsxNi0EYzuqribWw9FZedU0WsRbt2ho+gE5hiOPi7yyh
 Wb/A0/CB7C9pvLPpn0dPXkwFbWWPX3O1nR4WMXf700Fhs42e5Ece4lE/Be7+SFrcWA
 gLz6oaPLEiJN23H2T8R8ySrG/o8CFNlWm4OsRcpo=
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/94982] New: '-Wformat-diag' diagnostics building GCC
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 10:46:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc
 target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-94982-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 10:46:37 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94982

            Bug ID: 94982
           Summary: '-Wformat-diag' diagnostics building GCC
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: other
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

In a x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC bootstrap build of commit
c416c52bcdb120db5e8c53a51bd78c4360daf79b (releases/gcc-10 branch point), I'm
counting 642 'warning: .* \[-Wformat-diag\]' diagnostics.  For some files i=
t's
hard to spot other diagnostics between all that "noise".  I'm not saying th=
at
'-Wformat-diag' diagnostics don't have any value (they do!), but there are
clearly bogus ones here -- we should do something about this, or disable if=
 not
interested?=