From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BBD2F385DC1B; Fri,  8 May 2020 02:09:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BBD2F385DC1B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1588903770;
 bh=1jyLD+AcdJzEbuu11vwnUwg+katpCjIQCcKkhz8MMjs=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=CizOgsBQOpcZ404q5FHcOmG1YK+3ip/WSYbEzG0j2D0J3mKoAqKQ2tTuY/TEg0Vxj
 +BYwdv254TFLryWFiOiSVEevbL8oQxlu1HSFxgyuGQ8rz9bK8XR801WKYHk8WRTKII
 MG/1KqGpLxLG6J5IXC0E+ZzLEgtqI7YTyFMxKADw=
From: "felix.yang at huawei dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94991] ICE: Segmentation fault with option
 -mgeneral-regs-only
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 02:09:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: felix.yang at huawei dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94991-4-IOksrlKl4J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94991-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94991-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 02:09:30 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94991

--- Comment #1 from Fei Yang <felix.yang at huawei dot com> ---
For the given testcase, we are doing FAIL for scalar floating move expand
pattern since TARGET_FLOAT is false with option -mgeneral-regs-only. But mo=
ve
expand pattern cannot fail. It would be better to to replace the FAIL with =
code
that bitcasts to the equivalent integer mode, using gen_lowpart.  Will prop=
ose
a patch for this.=