From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DAE84395CC12; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:46:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DAE84395CC12 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1589460388; bh=J2tqEJAGyoVzIqRVBwtp64w07O37yNpRmBaH5ZCnQ/I=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=W38bMCG7PwDHPgXnCR/ms+3Az5yUKJAPuCapNwvqKJeywK2WKaa3InuEFlvrLl/4f rcxAvtTW1e7VjCSvQVXoNV6SWENe7maNjd6s5SbhyUkXeK+aDwlvd2H8R9QAFzc7QH 65e2nCdg4bD5tpiDkP35gY10UMQibk6I+7NyXLrI= From: "seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/95053] [11 regression] ICE in f951: gfc_divide() Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:46:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:46:29 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95053 --- Comment #21 from Bill Seurer --- We can't modify the spec code but we can add "compatibility" options. Shouldn't the if test make the compiler ignore the statement with the divid= e by zero? It shouldn't ever be executed.=