From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id CDB5C396E054; Thu, 14 May 2020 14:57:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CDB5C396E054
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1589468257;
 bh=pVnVuGxvOgj1tMmCbY142uC91Q67XMTTI5QkPU4AHiA=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=GahYlFzwPpfZOZAQjocEV96rKb442Z0J1aW75IyWSgXKUOfgRmR2EZCCVn+9SMaDf
 IOlLb7yZQAZrQzOKSJNl0jY4Jq2TDNJVZKMaUjx3EOSuIzRDbuGl25bntMSmKBhZGo
 BOcdOYX7hjKFHvYHdHYBJL9bClslmf0Py40Q0B6E=
From: "wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/95053] [11 regression] ICE in f951: gfc_divide()
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:57:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-95053-4-KdOHAvaC4q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95053-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-95053-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:57:37 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95053

Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #22 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Breaking legitimate code, even if "borderline," does not seem right to me.=
=20=20
Zero division is generally a runtime exception because of such cases.

You write code for a general case, then later you discover "oh, well, we co=
uld
make this variable zero for our specific usage," and now the compiler throw=
s a
fit?  Seems like this is warning-level stuff.=