* [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262
2020-05-11 18:51 [Bug fortran/95067] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2020-05-12 6:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-12 7:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-12 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2020-05-12
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in
|tree_fits_shwi_p, at |tree_fits_shwi_p, at
|tree.c:7262 |tree.c:7262
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |hjl at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With -fcoarray=lib -O2 -gstabs -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols it started
since r9-6530-gfb055f4b745b1b56
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262
2020-05-11 18:51 [Bug fortran/95067] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-05-12 6:54 ` [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11 " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-05-12 7:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-06-20 19:13 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-05-12 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That commit looks totally unrelated ... but it's eventually that
/* If there was an input error and we don't really have a type,
avoid crashing and write something that is at least valid
by assuming `int'. */
if (type == error_mark_node)
type = integer_type_node;
in dbxout_type makes us later use uninitialized low/high. using
void_type_node might be less error-prone here.
Untested suggestion, that is. Take it or leave it ;) (stabs should go away)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262
2020-05-11 18:51 [Bug fortran/95067] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-05-12 6:54 ` [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11 " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-12 7:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-06-20 19:13 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:17 ` [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-06-20 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal |minor
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Appears to be fixed on GCC-11 master.
Given Richard's comment, anything left to do?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262
2020-05-11 18:51 [Bug fortran/95067] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262 gscfq@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-06-20 19:13 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:42 ` [Bug fortran/95067] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95067] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262
2020-05-11 18:51 [Bug fortran/95067] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262 gscfq@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:17 ` [Bug fortran/95067] [9/10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01 1:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95067] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262
2020-05-11 18:51 [Bug fortran/95067] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262 gscfq@t-online.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:42 ` [Bug fortran/95067] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-01 1:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/95067] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262
2020-05-11 18:51 [Bug fortran/95067] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_fits_shwi_p, at tree.c:7262 gscfq@t-online.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-12-01 1:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-01 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95067
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|10.5 |13.0
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
stabs debugging was removed in r13-2361-g7e0db0cdf01e9c so closing as won't
fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread