From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 41A443894C37; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:36:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 41A443894C37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718955391;
	bh=ERsj9xF7WzN4L9I+ZBdZAPAcPCgrz7YOFgeysQLrFuQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=a7SARknAnp5GxH7NZg5MTgZQQ5dDW/dTjoGewtJghR+vIYJl+pd0/Iu+8zAoNQqzu
	 HIDplKWQVHGMUNK+6nnc+bMExmx7B3hBr4jF7If6Lx+gUw2+zfF2/JfxcV920LU0yI
	 iVvYOGHg3kZ7d+b/Oy4s4c5eOAk4qeGc9MoFGkLE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and
 sources very out of date
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:36:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.97
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: deferred, documentation, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-951-4-ytGLNOX3c6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D951

--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> > Patch posted that might help with this a little bit:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/648306.html
>=20
> I don't know how much of that patch overlaps with what Richi pushed:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655312.html

Forgot about that, but ISTR I approved something in the end?

Anyway, reading over it the situation isn't as bad as described.=